Thanks For Using The Performance of a Lifetime!

Chatroom Auctions & Paid Classifides DDDPL's Additional Job Search

Last visit was: Fri Sep 22, 2017 2:21 am
It is currently Fri Sep 22, 2017 2:21 am

 [ 1 post ] 
 "Some Sticky Grammar Situations..." 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 45372
Post "Some Sticky Grammar Situations..."
Some Sticky Grammar Situations or How to Avoid Some Ugly Mistakes!

by Jan K., The Proofer

With the advent of electronic word-processing and spellchecker programs, many people just presume that simply by running spellchecker all of their grammar errors will be caught and corrected. This is simply not so. Spellchecker programs often include some grammar checking, but no man-made program can catch all the innuendoes of the English language.

This article can not possibly address all the common grammar mistakes. What it can do, however, is to highlight just a few common mistakes and give you some hints on how to avoid them or at least recognize them.

That vs. Which

Here’s a problem that is very common: when to use “that” and when to use “which,” since in today’s colloquial language we often substitute one for the other. There is one easily applied rule that should help you recognize when to use that or which:

Use “that” when the phrase following “that” is essential. For example:

Buy the dress that is red and blue.

As you can see, “red and blue” is essential to the instruction to “buy the dress” and therefore is prefaced by “that.” Without “red and blue,” you might buy the wrong dress.

Use “which” when the phrase is merely an add-on thought or not essential.

She bought a lovely dress, which was red and blue.

Here the sentence says that “she bought a lovely dress,” but “red and blue” is just an add-on thought. If you eliminated “red and blue” the basic intent of the sentence remains unchanged: she bought a lovely dress.

Now personally, red and blue isn’t the most attractive color combination for a dress, but the point is clear. In the first sentence “red and blue” is necessary to the intent of the statement, and in the second sentence “red and blue” is merely additional information.

This is a simplified explanation of the difference between “that” and “which” and should not be taken as the sole criteria for proper grammatical use of these words. The easy-to-understand example, however, should point you in the right direction of how each word should be used most correctly in a sentence.

Affect vs. Effect

As a copyeditor/proofreader, I wish I had a nickel for every time I either corrected this mistake and/or re-read a sentence to verify that the right word had been used.

This explanation could takes pages and pages to clarify, but let’s just give you a simple rule to use:

If you can substitute the word “influence” in the sentence and get the same basic meaning, then use “affect.”

The threat of rain affected our plans for the day.

Now, substitute “influence”:

The threat of rain influenced our plans for the day.

The basic intent is the same; therefore “affect” is the right word.

If you can substitute words like “reaction” or consequence” in the sentence and get the same basic meaning, then use “effect.”

The effect of the rain was that we moved our backyard picnic into the kitchen.

Now, substitute “consequence”:

The consequence of the rain was that we moved our backyard picnic into the kitchen.

Well, OK, it isn’t something you would likely say, but the meaning of the sentence remained basically the same, so “effect” is the right word.

Once again, this is a very simplified rule, but you should get the general point. If you can make the substitutions I’ve given you without changing the basic meaning of the sentence, then you will know which word is the right word.

It’s vs. Its

This one is so easy, and yet it is often missed.

Oh, let me re-write that:

This one is so easy, and yet it’s often missed.

There’s your first clue: “it’s” is the contraction of “it is.” It’s NOT the singular possessive form of “it.” You know that if you want to indicate that the ball belongs to Bob, you write “Bob’s ball.” However, if “it” has a bad smell, then you write “its smell was awful.”

If you can substitute “it is” in the sentence, and the meaning remains unchanged, then use “it’s.”

However, the use of contractions in formal writing is not generally approved. You should not use any contractions in business communications, texts, or any writing that is formal.

There, They’re, or Their

Once again, this is easy and yet so many people miss it.

“There” indicates a place or a situation.

“They’re” is the contraction of “they are.” If you can substitute “they are” in the sentence, then use “they’re.”

“Their” is a plural possessive, that is something belongs to more than one person. If you can substitute more than one name (or thing) and not change the meaning of the sentence, then use “their.”

There are many other common grammar mistakes, but these few are certainly among the most common. If you are planning to write something, and you are unsure about some of the more basic grammar rules, I suggest you buy an easy-to-read-and-understand grammar book. Any bookstore has them, and you can buy great self-help books for under $20. I have three and I use them constantly!

Of course, your best course of action is that for anything you write for publication or business purposes, you should engage the services of a proofreader. And don’t wait until you think you are “all done” with the project! Get the proofreader involved as soon as you have a working draft. Proofreaders are often great sources to help you unravel difficult-to-understand text and can help you achieve the best possible manuscript.

For a list of reference books related to proofreading, copyediting, and the publishing industry, please see my recommended book list at

Jan K., The Proofer is freelance proofreader and copyeditor. Visit http://www.jansportal for more information about Jan’s proofreading and copyediting services and Jan's other free resources. Please visit Mom's Break ( for free printable crafts and projects. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.

[Note: Due to size restriction, the subject line's title had to be abbreviated. Appologies to Jan K. - Admin.]

This article was posted by permission.

Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:15 pm
 [ 1 post ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.